In many countries, government spent a large amount of money on improving internet access. Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money?


BÀI MẪU
A huge proportion of national budget is allocated for providing people with easier access to the Internet. There are several reasons for such spending and, in my view, this is not the most suitable way to use state money.

The government understand how the Internet benefits the lives of their citizens and also the limitation of access to the network in a number of places across their countries. The Internet has proven powerful in dispensing educational services and general knowledge about all aspects of life, not to mention the fact that it could facilitate communication even between continents. There is no arguing why governments pay much heed to the development of the network, just as to boost the overall quality of life for their people. Additionally, perhaps the inaccessibility of the Internet in many areas, especially disadvantaged ones for which mountainous villages in Vietnam could be brought up as a prime example, has the government draw a conclusion to pour their money into improving the Internet.

Much as those analyzed points above, I still believe large financial spending on such a field could, sometimes, be seen as unproductive or even counter-productive. In fact, only half of  the  world population has Internet connection; and even if the government were able to expand the network, it would be, I believe, hardly reachable for the rest of the world for the time being. The result would not be equivalent to the enormous amount of governmental funding. Instead, there are some other areas that authorities could invest in as a pre-requisite complement before supplying a widespread network. Constructing schools and sending qualified teachers to areas that are used to the absence of the Internet and are unaware of the benefits it might offer could be more promising.

In conclusion, there are two main explanations for governments’ special attention to improving the Internet access; and I think this is not the most optimal way to spend money.

Từ vựng chủ lực:

A huge proportion of national budget: Một phần lớn ngân sách nhà nước
To dispense educational services and general knowledge about all aspects of life: đem đến những dịch vụ giáo dục và kiến thức chung về tất cả các khía cạnh của cuộc sống
To pour their money into improving the Internet: Đổ tiền vào nâng cấp Internet
To be equivalent to the enormous amount of governmental funding: Cân xứng với khối lượng kinh phí khổng lồ từ chính phủ
To be used to the absence of the Internet: Quen với việc không có Internet

Related Posts:

  • Exams for Writing 1 1. The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 2. Many … Read More
  • Writing Upper Int 2: Task 1 The table below shows key data on the demographics of four different countries. The table compares four different countries in terms of population, GDP per capita and average life expectancy. Overall, the… Read More
  • Writing Upper Int 1: Tast 2 Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss b… Read More
  • Exams for Writing 3 1. It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 2. Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but n… Read More
  • Exams for Writing 2 1. Leaders and directors in an organisation are normally older people. Some people think younger leader would be better. Do you agree or disagree? 2. Some people think that there should be some strict contr… Read More

0 comment:

Post a Comment

TOP POST